Thursday, October 22, 2009
IRS Goes Hollywood
Monday, October 5, 2009
Conference Board Task Force Releases Report on Executive Compensation
- Compensation programs should drive a company’s business strategy and objectives and create shareholder (or community) value, consistent with an acceptable risk profile and through legal and ethical means. This means a significant portion of pay should be incentive compensation.
- Total compensation should be attractive to executives, affordable for the company, proportional to the executive’s contribution and fair to shareholders and employees.
- Companies should avoid practices such as multi-year employment agreements providing generous severance payments, gross-ups for tax consequences and benefits that are not generally available to other managers.
- Credible board oversight of executive compensation is critical.
- Compensation should be transparent, understandable and effectively communicated.
Interestingly, the report highlighted the fact that the median total annual compensation for CEOs dipped by less than 1% in 2008 (compared to the S&P 500 index which dropped nearly 40%).
The report can be found at http://www.conferenceboard.org/pdf_free/ExecCompensation2009.pdf
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Worker Classification in the News...Again
- Clarify the distinction between employees and independent contractors under federal law.
- Ensure that workers have adequate legal protection against retaliation after filing Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding.
- Define misclassification as a violation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
- Lift the ban on IRS/Treasury issuing regs or revenue rulings clarifying the employment status of individuals for purposes of employment taxes.
- Require service recipients to provide standardized documents to workers that explain their classification rights and tax obligations.
- Create an online classification system to guide service recipients and workers on classification determinations.
- Require service recipients to withhold taxes for independent contractors whose TINs IRS cannot verify, or who the IRS has determined are not fully tax compliant.
- Require universal tax withholding for payments made to independent contractors, using tax rates that are relatively low (e.g., 1% to 5% of payment amounts).
- Require each independent contractor to apply for a separate business TIN.
- Enhance coordination between IRS, DOL, and other federal agencies to share data and address misclassification.
Given the number and extent of relationships hospitals and healthcare systems have with outside providers, they have always been subject to scrutiny in this area. We have yet to be involved with an employment tax audit for a hospital where the IRS hasn’t found some grounds of employee misclassification. Areas of particular risk include:
- Medical directors
- Nighthawks
- Former employees
- Interim management
For any independent contractor relationship, if you don’t have a clear and convincing argument as to why they should be classified as independent, you risk a challenge as the IRS again increases its scrutiny.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
CEO Personally Responsible for Payroll Taxes
This case serves as a potent reminder that the officers and directors of hospitals who are experiencing financial adversity should pay close attention to the responsibilities of the hospital to continue to make its payroll deposits. The stakes are obviously very high.
The case can be found at: James Doulgeris v. United States; No. 8:08-cv-00282 (3 August, 2009)
Thursday, August 27, 2009
The Real Cost of a Stark Violation
A quick search on Google reveals that at least 60 different news sources have picked up this story to date. As such, the real long-term damage done to Covenant and its reputation in the community may go far beyond the $4.5 million fine.